Mass Tort Lawyers
Law Offices of Steven Gacovino, P.C. Offer Compassionate, Litigation‑Ready Advocacy for Survivors Nationwide
The Law Offices of Steven Gacovino, P.C. is a nationally recognized mass tort and complex injury law firm who work with our national partners in representing individuals and families harmed by systemic wrongdoing. Mass tort litigation allows victims to seek justice when corporations, institutions, manufacturers, and organizations place profits, reputation, or convenience above human safety.
Our firm focuses on cases involving sexual violence, exploitation, institutional abuse, dangerous products, toxic exposure, and large‑scale misconduct. As most Americans are aware, these cases are not isolated accidents. They arise from patterns of negligence, failure to warn, concealment, or deliberate indifference to foreseeable harm. Victims are often left with no recourse for their pain and suffering and the perpetrators continue causing widescale harm.
Every client who submits an inquiry or calls us with a potential valid claim receives a free confidential consultation, and every case is handled on a contingency fee basis only. There are no upfront costs. You pay nothing unless we successfully recover compensation.
Human Trafficking Lawyers – Sex Trafficking, Exploitation & Civil Accountability
Have you or someone you know been a victim of human sex trafficking?
Human trafficking is one of the most severe civil rights violations occurring in the modern era. Survivors of trafficking—particularly sex trafficking victims—are often subjected to repeated sexual assault, psychological coercion, physical violence, and complete loss of autonomy. Trafficking thrives where systems fail to intervene, corporations turn a blind eye to trafficking, where warning signs are ignored, and where businesses or institutions benefit financially while abuse continues.
Civil litigation plays a critical role in dismantling trafficking networks by holding not only traffickers accountable, but also third parties that enabled or profited from exploitation.
Contact Steven Gacovino Today!
Free Comprehensive Review
Legal Foundations for Human Trafficking Claims
Under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA), survivors of sex trafficking and forced labor have the right to pursue civil claims against traffickers and against entities that knowingly benefited from trafficking activity. New York State law further strengthens survivor protections through anti‑trafficking statutes and civil remedies that recognize the long‑term impact of exploitation.
These laws acknowledge that trafficking is rarely hidden and that failure to act in the face of obvious red flags can create civil liability.
Sex Trafficking and Commercial Sexual Exploitation
Sex trafficking frequently involves online recruitment, grooming through social media, transportation between locations, and repeated sexual exploitation. Survivors often later search for information related to hotels or motels—such as Motel 6—because traffickers move victims frequently. Civil cases focus on patterns of negligence, inadequate safeguards, and financial benefit, not assumptions of guilt.
Harm and Compensation
Survivors of human trafficking often suffer profound physical injuries, reproductive harm, chronic medical conditions, PTSD, anxiety, depression, and economic devastation. Civil compensation for human trafficking may include medical care, trauma‑informed therapy, lost income, diminished earning capacity, pain and suffering, and punitive damages where allowed.
Why Choose the Law Offices of Steven Gacovino, P.C.?
Our firm approaches trafficking cases with discretion, strength, and survivor‑centered advocacy. We understand how to prove cases of human trafficking despite the complexity of these cases and we will pursue accountability aggressively while protecting client privacy.
All trafficking cases are handled on a contingency fee basis, with a free confidential consultation. Simply click here to learn more about a making potential human trafficking claim.
Want a Free Confidential Consultation?
Child Sexual Abuse Lawyers – Institutional Negligence, Delayed Disclosure, and Lifelong Harm
Child sexual abuse is one of the most devastating injuries recognized under civil law. Survivors often carry the effects of abuse well into adulthood, long after the abuse itself has ended. Many struggle for years to understand how what happened to them has shaped their mental health, relationships, education, and sense of safety. Civil litigation for child sexual abuse exists because the law recognizes that children are uniquely vulnerable and that adults and institutions have an affirmative duty to protect them.
In many child sexual abuse cases, the harm was not limited to the actions of a single abuser. Abuse frequently occurred in environments where institutions ignored warning signs, failed to supervise properly, or actively concealed misconduct to protect their reputation. Schools, religious organizations, youth programs, foster care systems, and residential facilities may all bear civil responsibility when abuse was foreseeable and preventable.
Laws Governing Child Sexual Abuse Claims
New York’s Child Victims Act (CVA) fundamentally changed the legal landscape for survivors by extending statutes of limitation and opening lookback windows that allowed previously time-barred claims to proceed. Similar reforms across the country reflect a growing understanding that delayed disclosure is a common and well-documented consequence of childhood trauma. Survivors should not be denied justice simply because they were unable to speak when they were young.
Under civil law, survivors may pursue claims against individual abusers as well as institutions that negligently hired, supervised, retained, or failed to discipline perpetrators. These cases often involve extensive investigation into historical records, prior complaints, internal communications, and patterns of misconduct.
The Long-Term Impact of Childhood Sexual Trauma
Child sexual abuse often reshapes a survivor’s entire life trajectory. Many experience chronic anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and difficulties with trust and intimacy. Substance use disorders, self-harm, and suicidal ideation are tragically common. Educational disruptions and career instability frequently follow, as survivors struggle to focus, feel safe, or maintain consistent employment.
Civil compensation cannot undo the harm, but it can provide access to long-term therapy, psychiatric care, educational support, and financial stability. Damages in child sexual abuse cases may include compensation for medical and mental health treatment, pain and suffering, loss of earning capacity, and, in some cases, punitive damages designed to deter future misconduct.
Why Survivors Trust the Law Offices of Steven Gacovino, P.C.
Our firm represents child sexual abuse survivors with compassion, discretion, and resolve. We understand how difficult it is to revisit traumatic experiences, and we prioritize survivor dignity at every stage of litigation. At the same time, we are fully prepared to confront powerful institutions and insurers.
All child sexual abuse cases are handled on a contingency fee basis only, and every survivor is offered a free confidential consultation where you can have all of your questions answered.
New York Sexual Abuse Lawyers – Gender-Based Violence, Institutional Abuse, and NYC Civil Accountability
New York has enacted some of the strongest and most survivor-centered sexual abuse laws in the United States. These laws reflect a clear legislative judgment: sexual abuse is rarely an isolated act, and survivors should not be denied justice simply because abuse occurred years—or even decades—earlier. This is especially true in New York City, where gender-based violence statutes expand civil remedies and recognize the role of power, control, and institutional failure in enabling abuse.
Sexual abuse in New York affects people of all genders, ages, and backgrounds. It occurs in workplaces, educational institutions, healthcare facilities, correctional settings, religious organizations, and government-run facilities. In many cases, abuse was committed by individuals who held authority over the survivor, creating fear, coercion, and silence. Civil law exists to address these realities and to provide survivors with a meaningful path to accountability.
Gender-Based Violence Under New York and NYC Law
The Adult Survivors Act (ASA) marked a turning point for adult survivors of sexual abuse in New York. The ASA created a lookback window allowing survivors to file civil lawsuits regardless of when the abuse occurred. This legislation acknowledged what survivors and trauma experts have long known: many victims of sexual abuse are unable to report or pursue legal action until much later in life due to fear, shame, retaliation, or psychological harm.
In New York City, survivors may also bring claims under the Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Law (GMVP). This law provides a civil cause of action for victims of violence motivated by gender, including sexual assault and coercive sexual abuse. Importantly, the GMVPL recognizes that abuse is often rooted in power imbalances and systemic failures, not merely individual misconduct.
Together, these laws allow survivors to pursue claims even when criminal cases were never brought or were unsuccessful. Civil litigation focuses on accountability, compensation, and institutional reform rather than punishment alone.
Sexual Abuse in Institutional and Government Settings
A significant number of New York sexual abuse cases arise in institutional environments where individuals were deprived of freedom, autonomy, or meaningful ability to protect themselves. These settings often involve heightened vulnerability and a clear duty of care owed by the institution.
Sexual abuse in prisons, jails, and detention facilities is a well-documented problem nationwide, including in New York City. Individuals held at Rikers Island, state prisons, and local correctional facilities may be subjected to sexual abuse by staff or other detainees due to inadequate supervision, understaffing, or deliberate indifference. Survivors in custody often face additional barriers to reporting, including fear of retaliation, isolation, and lack of access to legal resources.
Abuse has also been reported in juvenile detention centers and youth correctional facilities, where minors are placed under the complete control of the state. In these environments, sexual abuse may be perpetrated by staff members, contractors, or other residents. Civil law recognizes that government entities and private operators of juvenile facilities may be held liable for failing to protect minors from foreseeable harm.
Sexual abuse claims may also arise in psychiatric hospitals, residential treatment centers, group homes, shelters, and foster care placements, where residents depend on caregivers and staff for safety, medical care, and basic needs. When abuse occurs in these settings, liability may extend beyond the individual perpetrator to the institution itself.
Workplace Sexual Abuse and Abuse of Authority
Sexual abuse in the workplace often involves exploitation of power and fear of retaliation. Survivors may be subjected to assault, coercion, or ongoing harassment by supervisors, managers, or individuals with authority over hiring, firing, or professional advancement.
In New York City, survivors may pursue civil claims for sexual abuse and gender-based violence even when the abuse does not fit traditional employment discrimination models. Civil litigation may focus on negligent supervision, failure to respond to complaints, and systemic tolerance of abusive behavior.
Workplace abuse frequently results in career disruption, loss of income, and long-term emotional distress. Survivors may leave industries entirely or suffer reputational harm after coming forward.
Physical, Psychological, and Economic Harm
The harm caused by sexual abuse is often lifelong. Survivors may experience physical injuries, chronic pain, sexually transmitted infections, and reproductive harm. Psychological injuries frequently include post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, depression, panic disorders, and dissociation. Many survivors struggle with sleep disturbances, substance use, and difficulty maintaining relationships.
Economic harm is also significant. Survivors may lose employment, abandon educational goals, or face reduced earning capacity due to trauma-related limitations. Civil compensation is designed to address these interconnected harms.
Compensation Available in New York Sexual Abuse Lawsuits
Survivors pursuing civil claims in New York may be entitled to compensation for medical treatment, therapy, psychiatric care, lost wages, diminished earning capacity, pain and suffering, and emotional distress. In cases involving egregious misconduct or institutional concealment, punitive damages may also be available.
Civil litigation can also result in non-monetary outcomes, including policy changes, public accountability, and improved safeguards designed to prevent future abuse.
Why Survivors Choose the Law Offices of Steven Gacovino, P.C.
The Law Offices of Steven Gacovino, P.C. and our partner firms have deep experience representing survivors of sexual abuse under New York and New York City law. We understand the legal complexities of ASA, the GMVPL, and gender-based violence claims, as well as the sensitive human realities underlying these cases.
Our firm represents survivors with discretion, strength, and respect. We handle all New York sexual abuse cases on a contingency fee basis only, and every client is offered a free confidential consultation. Survivors work directly with attorneys who are prepared to confront powerful institutions, government entities, and corporate defendants.
If you were sexually abused in New York City or elsewhere in the state, you may still have legal rights. Our firm is prepared to help you understand your options and pursue justice on your terms.
Social Media Harm Lawyers – Civil Liability for Platform-Driven Psychological Injury
Social media platforms were marketed as tools for connection, expression, and community. In reality, mounting evidence shows that many platforms were deliberately engineered to maximize user engagement at the expense of mental health, particularly among children, teenagers, and young adults. For families and individuals harmed by these practices, civil law provides a pathway to accountability.
Social media harm cases are increasingly treated as mass tort litigation because the injuries stem not from isolated misuse, but from uniform product design choices deployed at scale. Algorithms optimized for compulsive use, content amplification tied to outrage or sexualization, and inadequate safety controls have contributed to measurable psychological injury across millions of users.
How Social Media Platforms Cause Harm
Major social media companies rely on engagement-based algorithms designed to keep users online for as long as possible. These systems repeatedly expose users to emotionally charged content, social comparison triggers, and reinforcement loops that mimic addiction pathways in the brain. Internal research from multiple platforms has shown links between prolonged use and increased rates of anxiety, depression, eating disorders, self-harm, and suicidal ideation—particularly among adolescents.
Unlike neutral communication tools, modern platforms curate content aggressively. Vulnerable users may be pushed toward extreme dieting content, sexualized material, violent imagery, or communities that normalize self-harm. For minors, this exposure occurs during critical stages of brain development, when impulse control and emotional regulation are not fully formed.
Parents are often unaware of the extent to which platforms track behavior, test engagement responses, and refine algorithms to increase dependency. Safety features, when present, are frequently buried, ineffective, or subordinated to profit-driven design priorities.
Legal Theories in Social Media Harm Cases
Civil lawsuits involving social media harm focus on product liability, negligent design, failure to warn, and deceptive business practices. Plaintiffs allege that platforms knowingly created products that posed unreasonable risks to users while concealing internal data demonstrating those risks.
In cases involving minors, claims may also address violations of child protection statutes and consumer protection laws. Schools, healthcare providers, and families increasingly recognize that platform-driven harm is not simply a matter of personal responsibility, but the foreseeable result of corporate decision-making.
Social media harm litigation seeks to establish that platforms owed a duty to users—particularly young users—to design safer products and provide meaningful warnings. When that duty is breached, civil liability may follow.
Injuries and Losses Linked to Social Media Harm
The injuries associated with social media harm are often severe and life-altering. Individuals may suffer from chronic anxiety, depression, panic disorders, body dysmorphia, eating disorders, and post-traumatic stress symptoms. In extreme cases, social media exposure has been linked to suicide attempts and self-inflicted injury.
Educational disruption is common. Students may withdraw from school, experience declining academic performance, or require specialized mental health accommodations. Families may incur substantial costs for therapy, inpatient treatment, and long-term psychiatric care.
Civil compensation in social media harm cases may include recovery for medical expenses, therapy, educational disruption, loss of future earning capacity, and profound pain and suffering.
Why the Law Offices of Steven Gacovino, P.C. Handles Social Media Harm Cases
The Law Offices of Steven Gacovino, P.C. and our national partners represent individuals and families harmed by large social media corporations who become defendants in complex mass tort litigation. Social media harm cases require the resources, experience, and resolve to confront multinational technology companies and their insurers.
Our firm approaches these cases with both technical rigor and human sensitivity. We understand that families often struggle with guilt, confusion, and anger when learning how platforms affected their children. We offer a free confidential consultation and handle social media harm cases on a contingency fee basis only, meaning clients pay no legal fees unless compensation is recovered.
Video Game Addiction Lawyers – Corporate Accountability for Compulsive Design
Video games are no longer simple entertainment products. Many modern games incorporate monetization systems, reward loops, and behavioral engineering techniques designed to drive compulsive use. When these systems result in addiction-like behaviors and psychological harm, civil law provides a mechanism for accountability.
Video game addiction cases increasingly resemble mass tort claims because the alleged harm arises from standardized design features deployed across millions of users. Loot boxes, variable reward schedules, microtransactions, and time-gated content are intentionally crafted to exploit neurological reward systems.
How Video Games Are Engineered for Dependency
Many popular games rely on intermittent reinforcement—the same psychological mechanism used in gambling devices. Players receive unpredictable rewards that encourage repeated play, even in the face of negative consequences. Progression systems are structured to penalize disengagement, creating anxiety around falling behind peers.
For minors, these systems are particularly dangerous. Children and adolescents have underdeveloped impulse control and heightened sensitivity to rewards. Prolonged gaming can interfere with sleep, academic performance, social development, and emotional regulation.
Parents often report drastic behavioral changes, including aggression, withdrawal, and emotional volatility. In severe cases, gaming addiction has been linked to depression, anxiety disorders, and suicidal ideation.
Legal Claims in Video Game Addiction Litigation
Civil lawsuits involving video game addiction may allege defective product design, failure to warn, and deceptive consumer practices. Plaintiffs argue that companies intentionally engineered addictive mechanics without adequate safeguards or disclosures.
Claims may also address the targeting of minors through marketing strategies, in-game purchases, and social features designed to increase peer pressure and spending. When companies profit from compulsive use while ignoring foreseeable harm, civil liability may attach.
Video game addiction litigation seeks not to ban games, but to hold corporations accountable for design choices that place profits over player well-being.
Harm and Compensation in Video Game Addiction Cases
The harm caused by video game addiction can extend far beyond excessive screen time. Individuals may experience academic failure, job loss, social isolation, and significant mental health deterioration. Families may incur substantial costs for counseling, addiction treatment, and educational support.
Compensation may be available for medical and psychological treatment, lost educational opportunities, diminished earning capacity, and emotional distress. In some cases, claims may also seek injunctive relief requiring design changes or improved warnings.
Why the Law Offices of Steven Gacovino, P.C. and our national partners represent Video Game Addiction Victims
The Law Offices of Steven Gacovino, P.C. and our national partners have the experience necessary to litigate against powerful corporate defendants in emerging areas of mass tort law. Video game addiction cases require a sophisticated understanding of behavioral science, corporate practices, and product liability principles.
Our firm offers a free confidential consultation to families and individuals affected by video game addiction and represents clients on a contingency fee basis only. We are committed to helping clients pursue accountability and meaningful change.
Ozempic and GLP-1 Drug Harm Lawyers – Corporate Accountability for Pharmaceutical Injury
Prescription drugs marketed for chronic conditions carry an extraordinary responsibility: manufacturers must fully disclose risks, conduct adequate testing, and prioritize patient safety over rapid market expansion. In recent years, GLP-1 receptor agonist drugs such as Ozempic, Wegovy, and similar medications have been aggressively marketed for diabetes management and weight loss. As usage has expanded at an unprecedented rate, so too have reports of serious and sometimes permanent injuries.
Ozempic and related GLP-1 drug cases are increasingly being litigated as mass torts because the alleged harms arise from uniform design, labeling, and marketing decisions affecting large populations of patients. Civil litigation focuses not on whether these medications have benefits for some patients, but on whether manufacturers failed to adequately warn about known risks and foreseeable injuries.
How GLP-1 Drugs Work and Why Risk Matters
GLP-1 receptor agonists work by mimicking a naturally occurring hormone involved in blood sugar regulation and appetite control. These drugs slow gastric emptying, suppress appetite, and alter gastrointestinal signaling. While these mechanisms can assist with glucose management and weight loss, they also introduce significant risks that must be clearly communicated to prescribing physicians and patients.
As prescriptions expanded beyond narrow diabetic populations into widespread off-label and weight-loss use, concerns emerged about whether safety data adequately reflected real-world usage. When medications are promoted for long-term or lifestyle use, even moderate risks can translate into large-scale harm.
Reported Injuries Associated with Ozempic and GLP-1 Drugs
Patients taking Ozempic and similar medications have reported a range of serious gastrointestinal and systemic injuries. These include gastroparesis (stomach paralysis), severe and persistent nausea and vomiting, bowel obstruction, intestinal injury, gallbladder disease, and pancreatitis. In some cases, symptoms persist long after the drug is discontinued, fundamentally altering a patient’s quality of life.
Gastroparesis is particularly concerning because it can be debilitating and irreversible. Patients may experience chronic pain, inability to eat normally, malnutrition, and repeated hospitalizations. These outcomes are not minor side effects; they represent profound medical injuries with lifelong consequences.
Some patients also report psychological harm associated with sudden illness, weight fluctuations, and loss of bodily autonomy. When individuals take medication expecting improved health and instead suffer lasting injury, the emotional toll can be substantial.
Failure to Warn and Pharmaceutical Liability
Pharmaceutical manufacturers have a legal duty to warn consumers and healthcare providers of known or reasonably knowable risks. Ozempic litigation focuses on whether drug makers failed to adequately disclose the severity, likelihood, or permanence of gastrointestinal injuries associated with GLP-1 drugs.
Civil claims may allege that manufacturers minimized risks in labeling, marketing materials, or physician outreach while emphasizing benefits. Internal studies, post-marketing data, and adverse event reports play a critical role in determining whether companies knew—or should have known—about the scope of potential harm.
Mass tort litigation seeks to uncover whether corporate decisions prioritized market dominance and revenue growth over patient safety.
Who May Have a Claim
Individuals who were prescribed Ozempic or similar GLP-1 drugs and subsequently developed severe gastrointestinal injury, gastroparesis, or related complications may have viable civil claims. This includes patients who were prescribed the drug for diabetes management as well as those who received it for weight loss.
Claims may be especially strong where patients were not adequately warned of the risk of permanent or long-term injury, or where symptoms continued after discontinuation of the medication.
Compensation in Ozempic and GLP-1 Drug Lawsuits
Victims of Ozempic drug harm may seek compensation for medical expenses, hospitalization, diagnostic testing, long-term treatment, lost income, diminished earning capacity, and pain and suffering. In cases involving permanent injury, damages may also account for lifelong medical needs and reduced quality of life.
Civil litigation can also drive changes in labeling, warnings, and prescribing practices, helping to protect future patients.
Why the Law Offices of Steven Gacovino, P.C. Handles Ozempic Cases
The Law Offices of Steven Gacovino, P.C. and our national partners represent individuals harmed by dangerous pharmaceutical products in complex mass tort litigation. Drug injury cases require a deep understanding of medical evidence, regulatory frameworks, and corporate accountability.
Our firm approaches Ozempic and GLP-1 drug cases with careful attention to both the science and the human impact of injury. We offer a free confidential consultation and represent clients on a contingency fee basis only, meaning there is no cost to pursue a claim unless compensation is recovered.
If you or a loved one suffered serious harm after taking Ozempic or a related GLP-1 medication, our firm is prepared to help you understand your legal options and pursue justice.
Mesothelioma and Asbestos Lawyers – Accountability for Occupational and Environmental Exposure
Mesothelioma and asbestos-related disease litigation represents one of the most established and consequential areas of mass tort law. For decades, corporations knowingly exposed workers, service members, and communities to asbestos despite clear scientific evidence that inhalation of asbestos fibers causes fatal disease. Civil litigation exists to hold these entities accountable and to provide financial security for individuals and families facing devastating diagnoses.
Mesothelioma cases are not about unforeseeable accidents. They are about corporate knowledge, concealment, and prolonged exposure to a known carcinogen. Asbestos litigation has revealed internal documents showing that many manufacturers understood the risks long before warnings were provided—if they were provided at all.
What Is Mesothelioma and How Asbestos Causes Disease
Mesothelioma is an aggressive and rare cancer that affects the lining of the lungs, abdomen, heart, or testes. It is almost exclusively caused by asbestos exposure. Unlike other cancers, mesothelioma has a long latency period, often developing 20 to 50 years after exposure. This delay means individuals may be diagnosed long after the responsible companies have merged, dissolved, or rebranded.
When asbestos fibers are inhaled or ingested, they become lodged in body tissues, causing chronic inflammation and cellular damage. Over time, this damage can lead to mesothelioma, lung cancer, asbestosis, and other serious respiratory diseases. There is no safe level of asbestos exposure.
Where Asbestos Exposure Occurred
Asbestos was widely used in construction, manufacturing, shipbuilding, power generation, and consumer products throughout much of the 20th century. Workers were exposed in shipyards, factories, refineries, power plants, construction sites, and automotive repair facilities. Trades such as electricians, plumbers, pipefitters, mechanics, and insulators faced particularly high risk.
Exposure was not limited to workplaces. Family members were often exposed through secondary exposure, when asbestos fibers were brought home on clothing or equipment. Communities near industrial sites also suffered environmental exposure.
Veterans face elevated rates of asbestos-related disease due to extensive asbestos use in naval vessels, military bases, and aircraft. Service members were rarely warned of the dangers, even as evidence mounted.
Corporate Knowledge and Failure to Warn
Asbestos litigation has uncovered decades of corporate misconduct. Manufacturers and suppliers were aware of asbestos risks as early as the 1930s, yet continued to market asbestos-containing products without adequate warnings. Some companies actively suppressed research, manipulated medical literature, or shifted liability to subcontractors.
Civil claims allege that companies breached their duty to provide safe products and workplaces. Liability may extend to manufacturers, distributors, contractors, premises owners, and employers who failed to implement safety measures.
Injuries, Prognosis, and Impact on Families
Mesothelioma is a devastating diagnosis. Treatment often involves surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, or experimental therapies, all of which carry significant physical and emotional tolls. Prognosis is frequently poor, and families may face overwhelming medical expenses, loss of income, and anticipatory grief.
Beyond the physical suffering, patients experience loss of independence, pain, and diminished quality of life. Families often become caregivers, sacrificing employment and stability to provide support.
Compensation in Mesothelioma and Asbestos Lawsuits
Individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma or asbestos-related disease may be entitled to substantial compensation. Damages may include medical expenses, lost wages, reduced earning capacity, pain and suffering, and loss of consortium for spouses.
In some cases, compensation may be available through asbestos trust funds, established by bankrupt companies to compensate victims. Civil lawsuits may also proceed against solvent defendants responsible for exposure.
Because of the long latency period, many claims remain viable decades after exposure occurred. Experienced legal counsel is essential to identify responsible parties and applicable compensation sources.
Why the Law Offices of Steven Gacovino, P.C. and our national partners represent Mesothelioma Victims
The Law Offices of Steven Gacovino, P.C. and our national partners represent individuals and families affected by asbestos exposure with the seriousness and dedication these cases demand. Mesothelioma litigation requires meticulous investigation, historical product identification, and coordination with medical experts.
Our firm understands the urgency these cases present. We offer a free confidential consultation and handle all mesothelioma and asbestos cases on a contingency fee basis only, meaning clients pay no legal fees unless compensation is recovered.
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with mesothelioma or another asbestos-related disease, our firm is prepared to help you pursue accountability and financial security.