Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Lawyers: Claims for Patients Who Suffered Serious Injuries
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Lawyers: Claims for Patients Who Suffered Serious Injuries
Were you injured after receiving a Bard PowerPort implanted port? If your port was implanted in 2013 or later, was subsequently removed or replaced, or doctors attempted to remove it, and you experienced a serious complication, you may want to learn whether you qualify for a potential Bard PowerPort injury claim.
The Law Offices of Steven Gacovino, P.C., is investigating potential claims involving Bard PowerPort implanted catheter devices for individuals who experienced serious complications, including catheter fracture, catheter fragment migration, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, bloodstream infection, sepsis, or bacteremia.
Our firm offers free, confidential consultations to discuss potential claims and explain the next steps for evaluating your circumstances. Through appropriate national representation arrangements, we can also discuss whether your case may be handled directly or referred to suitable counsel.
You do not need to know the exact model of your implanted port to start the conversation. Your medical records may help identify the manufacturer, model, implantation date, and circumstances surrounding your injury.
Request a Free, Confidential Bard PowerPort Claim Review
Call 844-692-1200 or contact our office to discuss your situation.
Note: Preliminary screening criteria do not guarantee legal eligibility. Each potential claim requires an individual review of the device, medical evidence, injury, causation, damages, applicable law, and filing deadlines.
Contact Steven Gacovino Today!
Free Comprehensive Review
Do I Qualify for a Bard PowerPort Lawsuit?
If you are searching for a Bard PowerPort lawyer because you or a loved one experienced a serious complication, start by reviewing the circumstances currently being used to screen potential claims.
The attorneys working with our firm have identified four central screening factors.
1. You had an implanted port
The device may have been described as a:
- Bard PowerPort
- PowerPort
- Implanted port
- Chest port
- Chemotherapy port or chemo port
- Port-a-Cath
- Mediport
- Central venous access device
These terms are not proof that the device was manufactured by Bard. Medical records may be necessary to establish the exact manufacturer and model.
2. The port was implanted in 2013 or later
The current screening criteria focus on implanted ports placed in 2013 or later.
If you cannot remember when your port was implanted, the date may be documented in your hospital records, operative report, oncology records, implant record, or other medical documentation.
Do not guess at the date. One of our attorneys can explain which records may help establish it.
3. The port was later removed, replaced, or doctors attempted to remove it
The current criteria identify cases in which the implanted port was subsequently removed, replaced, or subject to an attempted removal.
Records explaining why the device was removed, whether a complication was discovered during the procedure, and whether additional treatment was required may be important.
If your circumstances are different or you are unsure whether your procedure meets this criterion, explain what happened during an initial consultation.
4. You experienced a qualifying complication
The current screening criteria specifically identify the following complications:
- Catheter fracture: The catheter broke, cracked, or separated.
- Catheter migration: A catheter or fragment moved from its intended location.
- Deep vein thrombosis: A blood clot formed in a deep vein.
- Pulmonary embolism: A blood clot or other material obstructed a blood vessel in the lungs.
- Bloodstream infection: An infection involved the bloodstream.
- Sepsis: A serious, potentially life-threatening response to infection.
- Bacteremia: Bacteria were present in the bloodstream.
A complication must be evaluated in the context of the device, medical records, and circumstances. The fact that an injury occurred does not automatically establish that a PowerPort caused it or that a lawsuit is viable.
Check your potential eligibility
If these circumstances sound familiar, contact the Law Offices of Steven Gacovino, P.C., for a free, confidential discussion.
You can begin even if you do not have all your medical records or are uncertain about the exact device model.
Call 844-692-1200 to discuss a potential Bard PowerPort claim.
What Is a Bard PowerPort?
A Bard PowerPort is an implanted vascular access device designed to allow healthcare professionals to administer certain medications and treatments through a port connected to a catheter.
These devices are commonly associated with long-term medical treatment, including chemotherapy, intravenous medication, fluids, and other therapies that require repeated vascular access.
An implanted port generally includes a reservoir positioned beneath the skin and a catheter that connects the reservoir to a blood vessel. The device allows healthcare professionals to access the vascular system without repeatedly inserting a needle into a peripheral vein.
For patients undergoing cancer treatment or other long-term care, an implanted port can be an important part of their treatment plan.
However, implanted medical devices can have complications. Bard PowerPort litigation involves allegations concerning certain devices and injuries that plaintiffs claim resulted from device defects or inadequate warnings.
The existence of litigation does not mean every PowerPort was defective or that every patient who received one has a legal claim. The specific device, medical circumstances, and evidence matter.
Is a Bard PowerPort the same as a Mediport or Port-a-Cath?
Patients often use terms such as Mediport, Port-a-Cath, chest port, and chemo port when discussing an implanted vascular access device.
Some terms may refer to a particular product or brand, while others are used more generally. A patient who remembers having a chest port may not know the manufacturer or model.
That distinction is important in a potential product liability case. An attorney needs to establish which device was implanted and whether the evidence supports a claim involving that product.
If you do not know whether your device was manufactured by Bard, your implantation records may help answer the question.
Who manufactured Bard PowerPort devices?
Bard Access Systems and C.R. Bard are associated with Bard PowerPort products. C.R. Bard became part of Becton, Dickinson and Company, commonly known as BD.
The appropriate defendants in a particular lawsuit depend on the product, corporate history, claims asserted, and applicable law. The identity of potentially responsible parties should be established through legal investigation.
Want a Free Confidential Consultation?
Why Are Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Being Filed?
Bard PowerPort lawsuits involve allegations that certain implanted port catheter products were defectively designed, inadequately tested or warned about, or otherwise responsible for serious injuries.
Plaintiffs have alleged that certain device failures contributed to complications including catheter fractures, fragment migration, blood clots, infections, and other medical problems.
Depending on the facts and applicable law, product liability claims may involve allegations of defective design, manufacturing defects, failure to warn, misrepresentation, or other legally recognized theories.
These allegations must be evaluated individually. A lawsuit is not proof that every device was defective, and a complication alone does not establish that the manufacturer is legally responsible.
What injuries are associated with the litigation?
Complications discussed in Bard PowerPort litigation include:
- Catheter fracture or breakage
- Catheter fragment migration
- Catheter embolization
- Blood clots and thrombosis
- Deep vein thrombosis
- Pulmonary embolism
- Bloodstream infections
- Sepsis and bacteremia
- Vascular injury
- Cardiac injury associated with a device complication
- Additional medical procedures to address a device problem
The current screening criteria supplied for this claim review specifically emphasize catheter fracture or migration, DVT or pulmonary embolism, and bloodstream infection, sepsis, or bacteremia.
Other complications may be medically serious, but they should not automatically be represented as qualifying under the current criteria without further review.
Why are patients looking for Bard PowerPort lawyers?
Many patients initially search for information about a medical problem rather than a lawsuit. They may search for a broken port catheter, a fragment that moved through the body, a blood clot after port placement, or an infection involving an implanted device.
After learning that similar complications have been discussed in litigation, they may begin searching for a Bard PowerPort attorney or information about whether they can file a claim.
A legal review can help determine whether the device, injury, medical evidence, and other circumstances warrant further investigation.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Update: 2026 Litigation
Bard PowerPort litigation is proceeding in federal court, where cases involving common factual questions have been consolidated for coordinated pretrial proceedings.
One major development occurred in September 2026, when a federal jury in Arizona awarded $40 million in compensatory damages in the Divelbliss bellwether case involving a fractured Bard PowerPort catheter and migration of a fragment into the area of the plaintiff’s heart.
The result brought additional attention to the litigation, but it is important to understand what the verdict does and does not mean.
What was the $40 million Bard PowerPort verdict?
The September 2026 Divelbliss verdict was an award of compensatory damages in an individual case. The jury found for the plaintiff on design-defect and failure-to-warn claims.
The case involved allegations that the catheter fractured and that a fragment migrated to the plaintiff’s heart, requiring medical intervention.
The verdict was the first plaintiff verdict in the federal MDL bellwether program.
A $40 million verdict is not a $40 million settlement for every claimant. The outcome of an individual case depends on its evidence, injuries, legal issues, and other circumstances. The verdict does not guarantee that another claimant will receive compensation or establish a standard value for other claims.
What happened in the earlier Bard PowerPort infection trial?
An earlier bellwether trial involved allegations concerning an infection associated with an implanted port. In that case, the jury returned a defense verdict on several claims but did not reach a unanimous decision on the design-defect claim.
The different outcomes demonstrate why potential claims must be evaluated individually rather than assuming that every case will have the same result.
Why do bellwether trials matter?
Bellwether trials are selected cases used to help the parties evaluate evidence, legal arguments, and how juries respond to particular claims.
Their results can influence litigation strategy and settlement discussions. However, they do not automatically determine the outcome of other cases.
Additional bellwether trials have been scheduled as the litigation continues. Trial dates, court rulings, and other developments can change, so the current status should be verified against court records and reliable litigation reporting.
Where can I find current Bard PowerPort lawsuit updates?
The federal litigation is known as In re: Bard Implanted Port Catheter Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 3081, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona.
Current court orders, case management documents, and reliable litigation reporting are useful sources for following developments.
The Law Offices of Steven Gacovino, P.C., can discuss publicly reported developments and review whether your medical history warrants further investigation.
Litigation status on this page should be checked and updated before publication and whenever a material development occurs.
What Is Bard PowerPort MDL 3081?
MDL 3081 is the federal multidistrict litigation involving Bard implanted port catheter products.
Multidistrict litigation, or MDL, allows federal cases involving common factual questions to be coordinated before one federal judge for pretrial proceedings. This can reduce duplication and streamline issues such as discovery, expert evidence, and pretrial motions.
An MDL is not the same as a class action. Individual plaintiffs generally retain individual claims, and their injuries, medical evidence, damages, and legal circumstances remain important.
Does being part of MDL 3081 mean I qualify?
No. The existence of the MDL does not establish that a particular person has a valid claim.
A potential claimant must still establish the relevant device history, injury, evidence supporting causation, damages, and compliance with applicable legal requirements.
The current screening criteria for the claims being reviewed by our national partners focus on the implantation date, subsequent removal or attempted removal, and specified complications. An attorney must determine whether those criteria and the legal requirements apply to your circumstances.
Does the $40 million verdict determine what other claims are worth?
No. A bellwether verdict provides information about one case. Other cases may involve different injuries, evidence, medical treatment, and legal issues.
It is premature to assume that all claims will resolve for a particular amount. Any potential settlement or verdict depends on the facts and applicable law.
Bard PowerPort Catheter Fracture: What Happens If a Catheter Breaks?
Catheter fracture is one of the principal injury categories discussed in Bard PowerPort litigation.
A catheter fracture occurs when a catheter breaks, cracks, or separates. If a fragment remains inside the body or moves from its intended location, the patient may require additional evaluation or treatment.
The medical consequences depend on the fracture, the location of the fragment, the patient’s condition, and other circumstances.
Can a Bard PowerPort catheter break?
Catheter fracture is a recognized subject of the Bard PowerPort litigation. Plaintiffs in particular cases have alleged that fractures resulted from defects in the device or inadequate warnings.
The circumstances of each fracture must be investigated. A fracture does not automatically establish that a device was defective or that the manufacturer is legally responsible.
What happens if a catheter breaks inside the body?
A fractured catheter may be discovered during imaging, a medical procedure, routine follow-up, or evaluation of symptoms.
Depending on the location and circumstances, clinicians may need to locate the fragment, assess potential complications, or consider retrieval or other treatment.
Possible concerns can include fragment migration, vascular injury, or cardiac complications. The appropriate medical response depends on the patient’s condition and must be determined by qualified healthcare professionals.
Can a broken catheter fragment travel to the heart?
A catheter fragment can, in some circumstances, migrate through the vascular system. The location of any fragment and resulting complications must be established through appropriate medical evaluation.
The Divelbliss bellwether verdict has increased public attention on allegations involving catheter fracture and migration into the heart.
If your records document a fractured catheter, a migrated fragment, or a retrieval procedure, those records may be relevant when an attorney evaluates a potential claim.
What if my catheter broke during removal?
A fracture discovered during removal or an attempted removal warrants careful review. Relevant questions may include when the fracture occurred, whether a fragment remained in the body, what the medical team documented, and whether additional treatment was required.
A fracture during a procedure does not automatically establish product liability. The circumstances, device records, medical evidence, and legal issues must be evaluated.
Bard PowerPort Catheter Migration and Embolization
Catheter migration refers to movement of a catheter or fragment from its expected location. Embolization describes the movement of material through the bloodstream to another location.
In an implanted port catheter case, a migrated fragment may require imaging, monitoring, or a medical procedure, depending on its location and the patient’s condition.
Why is catheter migration important in a potential claim?
An attorney may need to review:
- The device and catheter involved
- Imaging documenting the suspected migration
- Medical notes describing the complication
- Operative or retrieval reports
- Treatment and hospitalization records
- Evidence connecting the device event to the injury
Records documenting migration can help establish what happened. However, legal causation and responsibility require additional analysis.
What if a catheter fragment was found near the heart?
A fragment located in or near the heart or a major blood vessel may require urgent specialist evaluation. The appropriate medical response depends on the fragment’s location and the patient’s condition.
For a potential legal claim, records identifying the fragment, documenting any intervention, and explaining the resulting injury may be important.
Bard PowerPort Blood Clot, DVT, and Pulmonary Embolism Claims
Blood clots are another category identified in the current screening criteria for potential Bard PowerPort claims.
Blood clots can develop for many reasons, including underlying illness, cancer, medical treatment, immobility, and catheter-related factors. A clot in someone who had an implanted port does not, by itself, establish that the device caused it.
Deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
Deep vein thrombosis occurs when a blood clot forms in a deep vein. Depending on its location and severity, DVT can cause pain, swelling, tenderness, or other symptoms. Some cases may have few noticeable symptoms.
Medical records documenting the diagnosis, treatment, and any assessment of its relationship to an implanted port may be relevant to a legal review.
Pulmonary embolism (PE)
A pulmonary embolism occurs when material, commonly a blood clot, blocks a blood vessel in the lungs. It can be life-threatening.
Sudden shortness of breath, chest pain, fainting, or other symptoms concerning for pulmonary embolism require emergency medical evaluation.
For a potential claim, relevant questions may include whether a clot was diagnosed, the circumstances surrounding its development, the treatment required, and whether medical evidence supports a connection to the implanted device.
Can I file a Bard PowerPort claim after a blood clot?
Possibly, depending on the circumstances. The current screening criteria identify DVT and pulmonary embolism among the complications being considered, together with the implantation and removal-related criteria.
Medical records, including diagnostic imaging, vascular studies, hospital discharge summaries, and treatment notes, may help an attorney evaluate the case.
Bard PowerPort Infection, Sepsis, and Bacteremia
Serious infections are another complication category identified in the current claim-screening criteria.
An infection in a patient with an implanted port can have several possible causes. Establishing a potential product liability claim requires more than showing that an infection occurred while the device was present.
Bloodstream infection
A bloodstream infection occurs when infectious organisms enter the blood. In a patient with an implanted vascular access device, clinicians may investigate whether the device was involved, among other potential sources.
Relevant records may include blood cultures, clinical assessments, antibiotic treatment, device removal documentation, and findings concerning the source of infection.
Bacteremia
Bacteremia means bacteria are present in the bloodstream. Its significance varies according to the organism, the patient’s condition, and the surrounding clinical circumstances.
A documented diagnosis may be relevant to a claim review, but it does not independently prove that the implanted port caused the condition.
Sepsis
Sepsis is a serious, potentially life-threatening response to infection that can cause organ dysfunction. It requires prompt medical care.
A patient who experienced sepsis after receiving an implanted port may have questions about whether the device contributed to the infection. Medical records, timing, clinical findings, and the treating professionals’ assessments are important to that investigation.
What if my port was removed because of an infection?
The reason for removal, the timing of the infection, and the findings documented during treatment may be important.
If the port was implanted in 2013 or later and was removed, replaced, or subject to an attempted removal, an attorney can assess whether the infection and other circumstances fit the current criteria for further review.
How Do I Know If I Had a Bard PowerPort?
Many patients do not remember the brand or model of an implanted port, particularly if it was placed years earlier during cancer treatment.
You can begin by identifying the hospital or medical facility where the port was implanted. Ask how to request your implantation records, operative report, and device documentation. If the port was removed, records from that procedure may also help.
Look for references to:
- Bard or Bard Access Systems
- PowerPort or a specific PowerPort model
- The device manufacturer and product name
- An implant catalog or model number
- The date of implantation
- The date and reason for removal
A generic reference to a port, Mediport, or Port-a-Cath may not establish that the device was manufactured by Bard.
If you cannot identify the manufacturer from your paperwork, an attorney can explain which records may help resolve the question.
What medical records should I look for?
Useful records may include:
Implantation or operative report: This may identify the manufacturer, model, implantation date, insertion location, and procedural details.
Implant record or device identification card: Some patients receive documentation identifying the implanted device. Preserve any card or related paperwork.
Oncology and hospital records: These may help establish why the port was placed, when it was used, and whether complications occurred.
Imaging reports: Radiology reports may document a suspected fracture, fragment migration, clot, or other complication.
Removal or replacement records: These can explain why the port was removed or replaced and whether a complication was identified.
Hospitalization and treatment records: If you experienced an infection, DVT, pulmonary embolism, sepsis, or another serious complication, records documenting diagnosis and treatment may be relevant.
Retrieval or corrective surgery reports: If doctors retrieved a catheter fragment or performed corrective treatment, the operative report may help explain what happened.
Do not delay seeking legal advice simply because you do not yet have every record. An initial discussion can help identify what documentation may be needed.
Bard PowerPort Settlement: What Is Known?
People searching for Bard PowerPort settlement information often want to know whether a settlement has been reached and how much a claim might be worth.
As of the litigation information reviewed for this page, no global Bard PowerPort settlement had been announced.
The $40 million Divelbliss verdict was an award of compensatory damages in an individual bellwether case. It was not a global settlement and does not establish a standard payout for other plaintiffs.
Is there an average Bard PowerPort settlement amount?
Without an established settlement program and reliable, comparable settlement data, a published average may be misleading.
A jury verdict in one case should not be presented as an average settlement or a prediction of what another claimant will receive.
What factors can affect a potential recovery?
If a claim proceeds, relevant considerations may include:
- The nature and severity of the injury
- The medical treatment required
- Hospitalizations, procedures, or additional surgery
- Documented medical expenses
- The effect of the injury on daily life
- Lost income or other legally recoverable losses
- The strength of evidence connecting the injury to the device
- Applicable legal defenses and other case-specific factors
No attorney can reliably promise a particular recovery without evaluating the relevant facts and law.
Does the $40 million verdict mean my claim is worth $40 million?
No. The verdict concerned the evidence and injuries in one case. Other cases may involve different medical conditions, treatment, damages, and legal issues.
A consultation can help determine whether your circumstances warrant further investigation, but no specific outcome or recovery can be guaranteed.
How to File a Bard PowerPort Lawsu
If you believe you were harmed by an implanted Bard PowerPort, the process generally begins with an attorney evaluating your circumstances.
Step 1: Describe the device and your medical history
Explain when the port was implanted, what it was used for, whether it was removed or replaced, and what complication occurred.
If you do not know the precise device model or implantation date, say so rather than guessing.
Step 2: Identify the complication
Describe whether your records document a fractured catheter, a migrated fragment, DVT, pulmonary embolism, bloodstream infection, sepsis, or bacteremia.
Explain what treatment you received and whether you required hospitalization, surgery, catheter retrieval, or other intervention.
Step 3: Identify relevant medical records
An attorney may ask about the implantation report, removal records, imaging, hospitalization, or other documentation.
You do not need to assume that every record is required before making an initial inquiry.
Step 4: Obtain a legal review
The attorney will need to evaluate the device, injury, medical evidence, potential causation, damages, applicable law, and deadlines.
Meeting the preliminary screening criteria does not automatically establish a valid claim.
Step 5: Determine the appropriate legal path
If the attorney believes there may be a viable claim, they can discuss representation and appropriate next steps. Depending on the circumstances, a case may involve federal multidistrict litigation, state court, or another applicable procedure.
The appropriate forum and legal strategy depend on the individual case and should be determined by counsel.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Statute of Limitations: Is There a Deadline?
Legal deadlines may apply, and they can vary depending on the state, the type of claim, the date of injury, when an injury or its cause was discovered, and other legal circumstances.
These deadlines are commonly called statutes of limitations. Additional procedural requirements or exceptions may apply in particular cases.
There is no single deadline that can safely be applied to every potential Bard PowerPort claimant nationwide.
Waiting to investigate a possible claim can create problems if a deadline is approaching. Even if your port was implanted years ago, it is worth obtaining legal advice promptly if you believe you experienced a qualifying complication.
Do not rely on a general online article to calculate your filing deadline. An attorney must assess the law applicable to your particular circumstances.
Can a Family Member Ask About a Bard PowerPort Claim?
Yes. A family member may contact an attorney to ask about a loved one’s potential claim.
This can be particularly helpful when the patient is hospitalized, dealing with serious complications, or unable to easily obtain medical records.
The attorney will need to establish who has authority to act on the patient’s behalf and whether the facts support a potential claim.
If the patient has died, separate questions about wrongful death or other claims may arise, depending on the circumstances and applicable law. A family member should not assume they automatically have authority to pursue a claim simply because they are related to the patient.
Frequently Asked Questions About Bard PowerPort Lawsuits
What is a Bard PowerPort lawsuit?
A Bard PowerPort lawsuit is a product liability claim involving allegations that a Bard implanted port catheter was defective, inadequately warned about, or otherwise responsible for an injury. The facts and legal basis of each claim must be evaluated individually.
Who may qualify for a Bard PowerPort claim?
The current screening criteria focus on people who had an implanted port placed in 2013 or later, whose port was subsequently removed, replaced, or subject to an attempted removal, and who experienced a specified complication such as catheter fracture or migration, DVT, pulmonary embolism, bloodstream infection, sepsis, or bacteremia. These criteria are a preliminary screen, not a guarantee of legal eligibility.
What if I had a Mediport or Port-a-Cath?
Those terms may be used to describe implanted ports, but they do not prove that your device was manufactured by Bard. Medical records may be needed to identify the manufacturer and model.
What if I do not remember when my port was implanted?
Your hospital, surgeon, oncology practice, or other treating facility may have records identifying the implantation date. Do not guess at the date when speaking with an attorney.
Does my port have to be removed?
The current criteria supplied for this claim review specify that the port was later removed, replaced, or doctors attempted to remove it. If your circumstances differ, explain them to an attorney rather than assuming you qualify or do not qualify.
What injuries are being considered?
The specified screening categories include catheter fracture or migration, blood clots such as DVT or pulmonary embolism, and bloodstream infection, sepsis, or bacteremia. Other medical complications require separate assessment and should not automatically be treated as qualifying.
What was the $40 million Bard PowerPort verdict?
In September 2026, a federal jury awarded $40 million in compensatory damages in the Divelbliss bellwether case. The award concerned the facts of that individual case and is not a guaranteed recovery or settlement amount for other claimants.
Has Bard PowerPort litigation reached a global settlement?
No global settlement had been announced in the litigation information reviewed for this page as of October 11, 2026. The status should be checked against current litigation developments before relying on it.
How many Bard PowerPort lawsuits are pending?
The number of cases in MDL 3081 changes as cases are filed, transferred, resolved, or otherwise proceed. Consult current court records or reliable, dated litigation reporting for the latest count rather than relying on an undated figure.
Can I make a claim if the catheter broke during removal?
That circumstance warrants review, but it does not automatically establish product liability. The timing of the fracture, medical findings, device records, and connection between the event and any injury all matter.
What if I experienced a blood clot after my port was removed?
The timing and cause of the clot must be evaluated medically and legally. The fact that a clot occurred after removal does not by itself establish that the device caused it.
How much does it cost to speak with a Bard PowerPort lawyer?
The Law Offices of Steven Gacovino, P.C., offers free, confidential consultations for potential claims. Any representation and fee arrangement must be confirmed with the firm in writing before proceeding.
How long does a Bard PowerPort lawsuit take?
There is no reliable universal timeline. The duration depends on the facts, court or litigation process, discovery, medical evidence, motions, trial scheduling, and any resolution discussions.
Can I contact the firm if I live outside New York?
You may contact the firm to discuss a potential claim. Whether the firm can directly represent you or arrange an appropriate referral depends on the state, applicable professional rules, and the firm’s representation arrangements. Confirm this during the initial consultation.
What should I do if I think my PowerPort has fractured?
Seek prompt medical advice if you suspect a device problem or have concerning symptoms. Sudden shortness of breath, chest pain, fainting, or other symptoms that may indicate a medical emergency require emergency care. Do not delay medical treatment to investigate a potential lawsuit.
Do I need medical records before contacting a lawyer?
Not necessarily for an initial conversation. Records may be needed to verify the device, establish the timeline, document the complication, and assess causation. An attorney can explain what to request.
Does a Bard PowerPort complication automatically mean I have a case?
No. A potential claim depends on the actual device, medical history, injury, evidence of causation, damages, applicable law, and other circumstances.
Request a Free, Confidential Bard PowerPort Claim Review
If you or a loved one received an implanted port in 2013 or later, later underwent removal, replacement, or an attempted removal, and experienced a serious complication, you may want to find out whether your circumstances warrant further legal review.
The Law Offices of Steven Gacovino, P.C., can discuss your situation and explain the next steps for evaluating a potential Bard PowerPort claim.
You do not need to know every technical detail of the device before asking questions. Medical records may help identify the manufacturer, model, implantation date, and details of the complication.
Contact the Law Offices of Steven Gacovino, P.C., for a free, confidential consultation.
Call 844-692-1200, or request a review through our online contact form above.
There is no obligation to proceed simply because you request a consultation. Any decision about representation will depend on the facts of your situation and the firm’s review.
Attorney advertising. This page provides general information, not legal or medical advice. The existence of litigation or a jury verdict does not establish liability in another case or guarantee compensation. No attorney-client relationship is created by reading this page or submitting an inquiry. Representation is subject to attorney review, applicable professional rules, and a written agreement where required. Litigation status and claim criteria may change and should be verified before publication.